33 Comments in moderation

West African Court of Appeal & Privy Council

REX V. SAM MOFOR

REX

V.

SAM MOFOR

THE WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL, HOLDEN AT LAGOS, NIGERIA

19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1944

2PLR/1944/42 (WACA)

OTHER CITATION(S)

2PLR/1944/42 (WACA)

(1944) X WACA P. 251

LEX (1944) – X WACA P. 251

BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS:

DONALD KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA

HARRAGIN, C.J., GOLD COAST

BROOKE, J.

BETWEEN:

REX – Respondent

AND

SAM MOFOR – Appellant

ORIGINATING COURT(S)

APPEAL BY THE DEFENDANT FROM HIS CONVICTION BY THE HIGH COURT OF CALABAR

REPRESENTATION

N. G. Hay — for the Crown

Appellant not present

ISSUE(S) FROM THE CAUSE(S) OF ACTION

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE:- Charge of unlawfully entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony — Conviction where finding inadequate to establish offence charged — Criminal Code, section 412 — How treated on appeal

CASE SUMMARY

Sam Mofor having been charged with unlawfully entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony therein, the trial Judge found that Sam Mofor had entered the house “for an illegal purpose”.

DECISION(S) OF THE WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL

Held (allowing the Appeal; and quashing the conviction and sentence) that:

It being of the essence of the offence that there should be intent to commit a felony, in the absence of a proper finding to that effect, the conviction was unwarranted.

MAIN JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was read by the President:

The Appellant was charged under Count I with unlawfully entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony therein contrary to section 412 of the Criminal Code. It is of the essence of the offence that there should be intent to commit a felony. The learned trial Judge found that the Appellant entered “for an illegal purpose”. He did not find that the entering was with intent to commit a felony, and indeed it is doubtful if there was intent to commit a felony. This is fatal to the conviction. The appeal against the conviction upon Count 1 is allowed, the conviction and sentence upon Count I are quashed and it is directed that in respect of Count 1 a judgment and verdict of acquittal be entered.

Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed.