33 Comments in moderation

West African Court of Appeal & Privy Council

REX

V.

DOSUMU FAGBAYI

WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL HOLDEN AT LAGOS, NIGERIA

31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1938

2PLR/1938/59 (WACA)

OTHER CITATION(S)

2PLR/1938/59 (WACA)

(1938) IV WACA P. 143

LEX (1938) – IV WACA P. 143

BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS

DONALD KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA

PETRIDES, C.J., GOLD COAST (GHANA)

WEBB, C.J., SIERA LEONE

BETWEEN:

REX — Respondent

AND

DOSUMU FAGBAYI — Appellant

ORIGINATING COURT(S)

APPEAL FROM CONVICTION BY HIGH COURT, IBADAN JUDICIAL DIVISION

REPRESENTATION

A. Soetan — for Appellant

C. N. S. Pollard — for Crown

ISSUE(S) FROM THE CAUSE(S) OF ACTION

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – PROOF OF CRIME:- Summary trial at very short notice when the appellant had already been informed that the preliminary investigation before the Magistrate was adjourned till a later date—Absence of the appellant’s witnesses and some of the prosecution witnesses — Legal effect

DECISION OF THE WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL

Held.

The appellant did not get a fair trial due to a summary trial leading to conviction without adequate notice amounting to a form of legal process by which substantial and grave injustice has been done.

Appeal allowed.

MAIN JUDGMENT

The following joint judgment was delivered:

KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA, PETRIDES, C.J., GOLD COAST AND WEBB, C.J., SIERRA LEONE.

In this case the appellant was brought before the Judge of the High Court, in the Ibadan Division, for summary trial at very short notice when the appellant had already been informed that the preliminary investigation before the Magistrate was adjourned till a later date. As a result the appellant’s witnesses were not available and the same applies even to some of the prosecution witnesses.

We are of opinion that as a result the appellant did not get a fair trial. There has been disclosed, in the words of Lord Watson in in re Dillet (12 App. Cases 459), “a disregard of the form of legal process by which substantial and grave injustice has been done.”

The appeal is accordingly allowed, the conviction and sentence are quashed and it is ordered that a judgment and verdict of acquittal be entered.

The appellant is discharged.