33 Comments in moderation

West African Court of Appeal & Privy Council

REX V. MATTHIAS ENEMA

REX

V.

MATTHIAS ENEMA

WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL, HOLDEN AT LAGOS, NIGERIA

2ND DAY OF JULY, 1941

2PLR/1941/3 (WACA)

OTHER CITATION(S)

2PLR/1941/3 (WACA)

(1941) VII WACA 134

LEX (1941) – WACA P. 134

BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS:

DONALD KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA

GRAHAM PAUL, C.J., SIERRA LEONE

BUTLER LLOYD, J.

BETWEEN:

REX – Respondent

AND

MATTHIAS ENEMA – Appellant

REPRESENTATION

Unsworth for Crown

ISSUE(S) FROM THE CAUSE(S) OF ACTION

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – PROOF OF CRIME:- Appellant charged with Stealing, contrary to section 390(5) of the Criminal Code —  Material witness slated as a witness —  Failure to call same — Legal effect

DECISION OF THE WEST AFRICAN COURT OF APPEAL

Conviction quashed.

MAIN JUDGMENT

The following joint judgment was delivered:-

KINGDON, C.J., NIGERIA, GRAHAM PAUL, C.J., SIERRA LEONE AND BUTLER LLOYD, J.

In this case, the appellant was convicted upon two counts for stealing by a person in the public service contra, section 390(5) Criminal Code. Upon the first count, a most material witness was Mr. Milne, the Assistant District Officer, in charge of the Prison where the appellant was a warder. The appellant, in the Magistrate’s Court, gave Mr. Milne’s name as a witness whom he wished to be called. Mr. Milne was not called, and the learned Acting Solicitor-General has intimated that in view of this failure to call a material witness he will not seek to uphold the conviction on this count.

The conviction and sentence upon count one are accordingly quashed and it is directed that in respect of count one a judgment and verdict of acquittal be entered.

There is no substance in the appeal against the conviction upon count two and the appeal against the conviction on that count is dismissed.

The appeal against sentence is dismissed.